//
you're reading...
Control System Engineering

P&ID: What is it?

First time I heard about P&ID in my work place, my mind spontaneously thought about Proportional, Integral, and Derivative approach that I have learned before when I was in college. But, I was totally wrong, P&ID here is stand for Piping and Instrumentation Diagram. Other names for P&ID’s or sometimes clients or other contractors may call these EFD’s (Engineering Flow Diagrams), MFD’s (Mechanical Flow Diagrams), or UFD’s (Utility Flow Diagrams).

Actually, P&ID is the “roadmap” to show the path to the piping and the destination for the instrument signals and highways. It shows the path to where the instruments connect to the process, i.e. piping, vessels or equipment, and how the equipment is being monitored or controlled. It is the communications link for all disciplines (Process, Piping, Instrumentation/systems, electrical, and the mechanical equipment groups).

In other words, P&ID could be said like the “Bible”, as the highest level of authority for control systems. It is the master plan for instruments and control systems for the project. For example, if there is a discrepancy between several documents, the P&ID is usually regarded as the highest authority; therefore the P&ID must be kept current  as much as possible.

P&ID’s show diagrammatically all the equipment for the process; all the piping with sized lines, major and minor, including block valves and other devices; instrumentation and controls, including in-line and off-line devices.  They also show the utility systems for the plant.

It is developed from the Process Flow Diagrams (PFD’s). The mechanical and hydraulic design portions of the P&ID’s are the responsibility of Systems Engineering, but Instrumentation and control design is the responsibility of Control Systems Engineering (CSE). 

On the P&ID’s we can find schematic representation of all process equipment, like towers, drums, heat exchangers, heaters, pumps, compressors, drivers, etc. with their equipment tag numbers. Just like the instrumentation, the representation for some of the mechanical equipment such as compressors may be of the simplified representation. Sometimes the vendors P&ID’s may be used for the detailed version.

All interconnecting process and utility piping with sizes, line numbers, pipe classes, and service (fluid) codes also could be found on P&ID’s. The P&ID’s then used to determine the service for the index.

Besides all that I mentioned above, P&ID’s also show  Block and check valves, piping components (traps, strainers, ect.), SP items, pressure relief devices, ect. Piping spec changes is also shown on P&ID’s since this is an important issue which means that the pipe has changed classes (I.e Class 300 to Class 150, or maybe C.S. to alloy.

Another thing we would find here is boundaries around supplier packages, but this may be later in the project when vendor documentation is received. This is also important because there can be issued such as input and output signals that go from package equipment vendor furnished instruments to the DCS or SIS. These instruments which are furnished by the package equipment vendor should not be requisitioned again. Also there could be issued and designated such as instruments furnished by the package equipment vendor, but shipped loose and mounted in piping external to the package.

Tie-ins and breaks between new and existing piping, equipment, and instruments just like an existing transmitter that has a new signal run into the control room, or furnishing a new orifice plate into existing orifice flanges, and could be existing TW’s that we put new thermocouples or RTD’s into are also shown on the P&ID’s.

Just like its name, Piping and Instrumentation Diagram, this drawing also show the Instrumentation and controls such as control room “bubbles” including DCS, SIS, and PLC devices. Usually an L (Low), LL (Low Low), H (High), or HH (High High) located outside and adjacent to the DCS bubble indicated a DCS alarm. But for revamp project on existing P&ID’s, we may see the alarms shown in DCS bubbles, i.e. PAH, LALL, etc.

The P&ID’s should show the field instruments including panel-mounted devices, analyzers, flow elements, and control valves. This includes diagrammatically depicting instrument wiring, pneumatic signals, data links, capillary tubing, and logic interlocks. It also shows instruments that are steam or electrically heat traced, location of field devices on panels, instrument air to solenoid valves for on-off valves, and even notes to describe special requirements about the instruments.

Last but not least, the P&ID’s should also show typical details for instruments whose connections and impulse lines require flushing to prevent plugging from solid particles in the fluid, and also a list of Tag Nos. requiring this detail. And finally this detail should show any check valves, small restriction orifices, purgemeters, etc. that are required.

Yeah, just like what I said before, it’s like a “Bibble” which shows so many necessary things required. But, after we know what actually P&ID’s are, have you ever thought or just wondered how to read it?

To be continued…

About ardnas20

an Instrument Designer who loves Movie, Music, and Photography...

Discussion

17 thoughts on “P&ID: What is it?

  1. it was very infomative.. you should have given ISA standard p&id symbols..
    Standard p&id symbols

    Posted by sajid | June 3, 2011, 6:51 am
    • yeah, i thought so. thank you so much for your kind advice, anyway.
      i think i’m gonna give ISA Standard on my next post about how to read P&ID’s (wish it can be published soon).

      by the way, it that instrumentpedia your blog?
      i think that’s so amazing 🙂

      Posted by ardnas20 | June 3, 2011, 7:50 am
  2. add nyo po ako fb ko po ay donnell_1994@yahoo.com

    Posted by donnell | July 4, 2011, 6:27 am
  3. This is a nice presentation of the P&ID!
    Ik work every day in the steam business, and used your blog while learning the industry.

    Thanks!

    Nick ( Belgium)

    Posted by whoopie | January 10, 2012, 9:52 am
  4. this is a good post. thanks 🙂

    Posted by iam wants to talk 0305 | February 21, 2013, 2:16 am
  5. i like diagrams as well article,nice work carry on.

    Posted by Rehan [Pakistan] | March 24, 2013, 7:40 am
  6. Your means of telling the whole thing in this post is genuinely pleasant, all can effortlessly know it, Thanks a
    lot.

    Posted by Taruhan Bola | April 12, 2013, 4:12 pm
  7. You hold the tools to get going and purchase if you like what
    you hear. Add to this some comfortable home theatre seating, so you’ve come as close with a real place of art or concert hall as you can possibly get. While the process, it automatically syncs to the music catalogue in your PC.

    Posted by Ada | June 30, 2013, 4:12 pm
  8. Somthing is better than nothing
    But i dont ģet mainly which i was looking…
    Share something special….

    Posted by zaid khan | August 13, 2013, 12:20 pm
  9. Best reference for P&ID standard: http://piping-and-instrumentation-diagram.com

    Posted by Asis | October 3, 2013, 8:37 pm
  10. Thanks for your sample P&ID. It’s great. I am gonna use as a part of my teaching materials.

    Posted by Bij | February 21, 2014, 6:04 am
  11. Thank. I was studied during my college and forgot also now you revise me about P & ID.

    Posted by vishal(India) | March 27, 2014, 5:56 am
  12. tell me about ,diffrnce between loop diagram and p&id ?

    Posted by sid | September 25, 2014, 9:32 am
  13. Thank you very much for sample P&ID.

    Posted by Gideon Chitsamba | November 11, 2014, 11:16 am
  14. This is a wrong statement ” Other names for P&ID’s or sometimes clients or other contractors may call these EFD’s (Engineering Flow Diagrams), MFD’s (Mechanical Flow Diagrams), or UFD’s (Utility Flow Diagrams).”
    EFD, UFD are different then P&ID. EFDs are more simple way of P&IDs.

    Posted by Barış Çelik | December 29, 2015, 8:49 am

Leave a reply to Ada Cancel reply

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.